Check out the newest Blockchain Tip Sheet published in the Blockchain Technology Guidelines on the Ohio ERC site. Blockchain Project Conversation Starters is the third tip sheet on Blockchain and serves as a guide to help records managers and archivists surface key recordkeeping and preservation issues when their organization is embarking upon blockchain projects. The document provides an overview of blockchain, general terminology, the life-cycle of records on a blockchain, among other concepts.
Social Media Training Opportunity
Take an interactive training on Social Media in Records Management! “Social Media: The Records Management Challenge” is for elected officials and other public employees who have personal social media accounts or government social media accounts. The training covers government use of social media, the capture, management and disposition factors of social media records and citizen interaction with the government through social media.
The training registration can be found at http://go.osu.edu/ohioerc-socialmedia. After registering, you will be taken to BuckeyeLearn to access the training. The training will take approximately 30 to 45 minutes. Upon completion of the training, you will be able to print a certificate of completion from BuckeyeLearn. Don’t miss your opportunity to take this free training today and please share with anyone you think may benefit from the information.
Voice messaging as public records
In an article published last month, CNN wrote about the increased use of voice messaging apps to communicate and socialize with friends, family and coworkers. Voice messaging, which serves as an alternative to calls or text messages, allows users to record audio clips and send them to recipients. They’re usually sent via messaging apps like iMessage, WhatsApp or Clubhouse as small audio files. As the middle ground between texting and calling, voice messaging is being heralded as a way to strike a balance between socialization and respect for people’s time and convenience.
Given its increased use, public entities would be wise to consider the potential public record implications of voice messaging. In Ohio, the definition of a public record includes “any document, device, or item, regardless of physical form or characteristic, including an electronic record, created or received by or coming under the jurisdiction of any public office of the state or its public subdivisions, which serves to document the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations or other activities of the office.”
Under this definition, the format of the record is irrelevant when determining whether a record is a public record. A public entity must look beyond the electronic medium (i.e. voice messaging) and analyze the content of the message to determine if the information is a “record” that the public may access.
If the voice message was “created, received by or comes under the jurisdiction” of the public office and “documents the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations or other activities of the office,” then it likely meets the definition of a public record. This means that those records may need to be retained for certain periods of time pursuant to the public entity’s record retention schedule.
If you have additional questions about the obligations of a public official or employee under Ohio’s public record laws, specifically as it relates to newer apps or social media, please visit the OhioERC’s online social media training course. Among other things, the course provides an overview of social platforms and how government entities use those platforms, the records management aspect of social media, and the unique challenges associated with capturing and disposing of social media content.